Illegal hunting is one of the worst issues in environmental field. I have read a news, published in
the site, which reporting unresolved(illegal hunting) cases around them.
A question appears why they do hunt in? They know that the meat always available in market,
even the bullet is more expensive compared to the meat itself! A good reason in itself:
1) Hunted meat is lean, healthy, and free from additives
2) It provides exercise and time in the outdoors, away from work pressures.
Yes, we understand that there are benefits of doing that, but do we accept the illegal hunting?
Some say, “Life feeds on Life, and Life gives Life to Life”. Yes them saying the truth. But illegal
hunting can cause uncontrolled demolishing of the natural ecosystem. Are the illegal hunters
always doing it for food or for monthly activities? For me, the answer is No! They do it for
money. It is just like stealing car and sells it cheap.
Because of the pro and contra, many countries are regulating about it. The hunter need a permit
before continue the activities. They have to declare their gun and bullet, how many they have, and
again to declare their yields, so that the authorities able to control the population of the animals
in the forest (perhaps).
Unfortunately, the seeding of the demolished animal, are seen very less because it is not
that many of body or NGO compared to the hunters itself, to do the rehabilitation work. The
correct authorities or government body need to brain wash, to encourage their citizen to take
part of the rehabilitation work by giving incentive, such as tax’s reduction or any special
treatment for doing good in order to balance the effect of illegal hunting.
My suggestion is that, every hunter must have their own centre for animal rehabilitation (feed
animal food with natural thing not sintetic to prevent additive, so that they will understand the
value are) and they have to replace back the hunt death with a reasonable number. If not,
stopped the hunting, don’t issued any permit and big fined for them.
